Gilbert Heights Elementary School

Portland, OR · Grades ?–5

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

2 stars

OR statewide rating — the rank below is this school's statewide position

Bottom 30% decoded

#526 of 680

plausibly #371–608

Oregon schools

#264 · Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro metro — Oregon side

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 30% achievement

#496 of 680

Oregon schools

#265 · Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro metro — Oregon side

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw achievement and decoded performance are both close to expected for this school's context.

Data confidence:High420 students tested 9 years96% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #526 of 680

in Oregon schools

Raw test scores rank this school #496, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #526.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • About averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 39% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • LowStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 33% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Below averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 17% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 11% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 39%54+1.7
Students gain ground year over year 33%15-11.6
Equity within the school 17%27-3.8
Most students were tested 11%96+5.1

Note: this school's Alpha-only Decoded Rank is #179 (vs the composite #526). The composite includes cohort progression and other signals that diverge from the context-adjusted Alpha. See methodology.

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

Strongest Subjects (Decoded)

Decoded rank first; achievement rank in parentheses. Sorted by decoded rank, best first. Science is shown for reference only and is not part of any rank, tier, or composite.

  1. Science

    2025 proficiency20.3%meeting standard

    Tested gradeGrade 5

    68 tested

    20227.3%202314.6%202417.2%202520.3%

    Shown for reference only — science is not part of any rank.

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
OR (680 schools)#496#526
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (345 schools)#265#264
Among similar schools (6 peers)#3#5

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
405
Free/reduced-price lunch
100.0%
Student-teacher ratio
18.4:1
Locale
City, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$74,382ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
14.2%ACS tract proxy
SES index
27.4
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within David Douglas SD 40: #12 of 13.Bottom quintile in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school are typically spread across proficiency levels.

  • Level 1 — Below standard48%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard27%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)13%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard12%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Alice Ott Middle School#240#170High
Gilbert Park Elementary School#298#231High
Ron Russell Middle School#281#37Medium
West Powellhurst Elementary School#307#92High
Earl Boyles Elementary#291#268High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Chenowith Elementary School#6#1High
Gervais Elementary School#35#9High
Rockwood Preparatory Academy#266#102High
Parklane Elementary School#310#285Medium
Woodland Elementary#314#178High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#265#264
2024#246#264
2023#258#260

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not used in the Decoded Rank — shown for context only.

2023: percentile 372024: percentile 482025: percentile 48

Holding steady

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +5.6 pct/yr (95% CI -30.5 to 41.7)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2023 lost 7 proficiency points by 5th grade — declining about 7× faster than the metro median.

Based on 18 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -4.0 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -8.4 to 0.4)

Cohort 201520162017201820192022202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
217
—
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
216
G5
205
-10.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
193
G4
177
G5
186
-3.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
248
G4
242
G5
247
-0.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
248
G4
244
G5
246
-0.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
222
G4
225
+2.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
239
—
ELA · started 5th in 2022
G5
167
—
ELA · started 4th in 2022
G4
194
G5
200
+5.8
ELA · started 3rd in 2022
G3
195
G4
201
G5
208
+6.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
200
G4
213
G5
203
+1.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
195
G4
200
+5.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
185
—
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
188
—
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
185
G5
163
-21.2
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
194
G4
194
G5
159
-17.4
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
228
G4
208
G5
187
-20.8
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
207
G4
228
G5
216
+4.8
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
210
G4
217
+6.6
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
217
—
Math · started 5th in 2022
G5
134
—
Math · started 4th in 2022
G4
165
G5
151
-14.8
Math · started 3rd in 2022
G3
165
G4
177
G5
159
-3.1
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
198
G4
207
G5
191
-3.7
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
175
G4
185
+10.0
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
176
—

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality. Its reliability shows up on the page as the confidence label and the rank interval, not as a standalone statistic.

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
27.4
FRL %
100.0%
ELL %
42.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
14.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$74,382
Tract poverty rate
14.2%
Tract % bachelor's+
20.1%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
September 4, 2026
Methodology version
0.14.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →