Hogan Cedars Elementary School

Gresham, OR · Grades K–5

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Middle 40% decoded

#241 of 430

plausibly #90–335

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Performing as Expected

#427 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#284 of 430

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

#408 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school performs roughly as expected for its context.

Data confidence:High441 students tested 7 years97% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #241 of 430

in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Raw test scores rank this school #284, but after accounting for context, students here outperform what the data would predict. The Decoded Rank places it at #241.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • About averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Above averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • LowDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%59+3.1
Students gain ground year over year 30%40-2.9
Equity within the school 15%68+2.7
Direction over recent years 10%0-5.0
Most students were tested 10%97+4.7

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (430 schools)#284#241
OR (667 schools)#408#427
Among similar schools (6 peers)#4#4

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
455
Free/reduced-price lunch
70.1%
Student-teacher ratio
18.2:1
Locale
Suburb, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$80,783ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
37.6
Assessment data year
2024
CCD year
2023
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Gresham-Barlow SD 10J: #7 of 15.Middle quintile in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school are typically spread across proficiency levels.

  • Level 1 — Below standard42%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard28%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)19%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard11%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Springwater Trail High School Rankings coming soon.
Gordon Russell Middle School#394#373Medium
Dexter McCarty Middle School#320#146Medium
East Gresham Elementary School#303#388High
Kelly Creek Elementary School#266#356High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Kinnaman Elementary School#337#318Medium
Whitcomb Elementary School#411#333High
Ash Creek Elementary School#37#19High
Milwaukie El Puente Elementary School#244#68High
Gib Olinger Elementary School#15#12High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2024#284#241
2023#233#182

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 822024: percentile 59

Trending down

Based on 2 years (2023–2024).

Slope: -23.4 pct/yr (no CI — too few years)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2023 lost 18 proficiency points by 4th grade — declining about 3× faster than the metro median.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: -2.6 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -11.4 to 6.2)

Medium confidence

Cohort 2015201620172018201920232024 Slope
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
250
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
234
G5
268
+34.1
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
233
G4
251
G5
263
+14.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
216
G4
221
G5
216
+0.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
248
G4
246
G5
240
-4.3
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
245
G4
224
-20.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
217
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
241
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
231
G5
241
+10.1
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
224
G4
205
-18.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
203
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
219
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
230
G5
221
-8.6
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
194
G4
228
G5
235
+20.6
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
211
G4
201
G5
177
-17.2
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
248
G4
268
G5
214
-17.1
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
223
G4
213
-10.1
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
225
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
184
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
186
G5
168
-18.2
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
206
G4
192
-14.4
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
185

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.09 (95% CI: +0.05 to +0.13)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
37.6
FRL %
70.1%
ELL %
32.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
16.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$80,783
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
18.2%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2023–24 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2023
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
July 26, 2026
Methodology version
0.9.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →