Ewing Young Elementary School

Newberg, OR · Grades K–5

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 15% decoded

#58 of 423

plausibly #32–204

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

★★ Outperforming Expectations

#110 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Top 15% achievement

#50 of 423

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

#53 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw scores are high here, and the school remains strong for its context; students tend to gain ground relative to peers over time.

Data confidence:Medium173 students tested 6 years85% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #58 of 423

in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • StrongStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • LowEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • Thin dataDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%85+12.2
Students gain ground year over year 30%80+9.0
Equity within the school 15%19-4.6
Direction over recent years · thin data10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%85+3.5

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (423 schools)#50#58
OR (669 schools)#53#110
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#2

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
206
Free/reduced-price lunch
25.7%
Student-teacher ratio
22.9:1
Locale
Rural, distant
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$100,497ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
77.9
Assessment data year
2023
CCD year
2022
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Newberg SD 29J: #2 of 8.Top-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Two distinct groups are visible: a strong cluster at the top and a struggling cluster at the bottom.

  • Level 1 — Below standard18%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard20%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)22%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard40%

Why this matters. A bimodal distribution often reflects two student populations served side-by-side (for example a gifted or honors track alongside a general-population cohort). Aggregate scores can hide this. Look at the school's program mix when comparing.

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Chehalem Valley Middle School#144#151Medium
Antonia Crater Elementary School#73#110High
Dundee Elementary School#89#203Medium
Joan Austin Elementary School#206#376Medium
Edwards Elementary School#189#28High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Harper Charter School#3Est. #7Low
Mulino Elementary School#214#408High
Irvington Elementary School#87#386High
Scotts Mills Elementary School#23#36Medium
Cascade Heights Public Charter School#139#60Medium

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2023#50#58

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not enough years yet

Trajectory will appear with 2025-26 data once we have two or more years of rankings for this school.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2017 gained 23 proficiency points by 5th grade — gaining, versus a metro median of about 0/yr.

Based on 10 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +5.6 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -1.9 to 13.2)

Medium confidence

Cohort 201520162017201820192023 Slope
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
303
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
297
G5
288
-8.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
272
G4
315
G5
304
+15.8
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
262
G4
267
G5
257
-2.3
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
280
G4
275
G5
302
+11.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
303
G4
293
-10.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
303
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
261
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
287
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
300
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
306
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
270
G5
274
+4.3
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
300
G4
292
G5
314
+7.2
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
247
G4
241
G5
275
+13.8
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
256
G4
278
G5
292
+18.0
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
293
G4
279
-14.6
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
310
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
217
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
322
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
290

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.55 (95% CI: +0.41 to +0.68)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
77.9
FRL %
25.7%
ELL %
7.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
17.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$100,497
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
40.9%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2022–23 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2022
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
July 26, 2026
Methodology version
0.9.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →