Perrydale School

Amity, OR · Grades K–12

Salem, OR

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Bottom 30% decoded

#84 of 102

Salem, OR schools

Below Expected

#733 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#39 of 102

Salem, OR schools

#471 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school performs roughly as expected for its context.

Data confidence:Medium278 students tested 8 years90% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #84 of 102

in Salem, OR schools

Raw test scores rank this school #39, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #84.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • Below averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • About averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • LowDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%27-7.9
Students gain ground year over year 30%41-2.6
Equity within the school 15%55+0.7
Direction over recent years 10%0-5.0
Most students were tested 10%90+4.0

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Salem, OR (102 schools)#39#84
OR (882 schools)#471#733
Among similar schools (6 peers)#4#5

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
319
Free/reduced-price lunch
47.3%
Student-teacher ratio
17.7:1
Locale
Rural, distant
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$109,648ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
76.1
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

High School Outcomes

Latest available data

Graduation 2025 · Coursework 2021 · AP exams 2015 · SAT/ACT 2021

Graduation
100%
2025 cohort · 96% extended · 18 students in cohort
Advanced options
Not reported
1 students in advanced math · CRDC 2021

Data limitations

  • Graduation uses state cohort data. Coursework, offerings, and SAT/ACT counts use the latest available federal CRDC extracts, which can lag current graduation data.
  • SAT/ACT data is count-only in this extract; without an enrollment denominator, we do not treat it as a participation rate.
  • HS Decoded Rank is alpha-only: it summarizes how the school's grade 10/11 test scores compare to expectations from its demographic context, ranked against other HSs in the same metro / state / rural cohort. Graduation, AP, and SAT/ACT data above are descriptive context — they are not yet blended into the composite rank.

Within Perrydale SD 21: #1 of 1. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard39%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard25%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)24%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard11%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Lyle Elementary School#61#54Medium
LaCreole Middle School#36#11Medium
Whitworth Elementary School#41#40High
Dallas High School Rankings coming soon.
Dallas Community Charter Rankings coming soon.

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
North Star Elementary#17#30Medium
Buckman Elementary School#134#293Medium
Forest Park Elementary School#8#12High
Harriet Tubman Middle School#166#62Medium
Buckingham Elementary School#12#28High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#39#84
2024#46#70
2023#42#61

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 442024: percentile 402025: percentile 27

Trending down

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: -8.3 pct/yr (95% CI -41.1 to 24.5)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 57 proficiency points by 11th grade — gaining slower than the metro median.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: +0.2 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -6.6 to 6.9)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 11th in 2015
G11
254
ELA · started 11th in 2016
G11
264
ELA · started 11th in 2017
G11
285
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
248
G11
310
+20.8
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
248
G8
273
G11
314
+15.9
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
255
G7
264
G8
213
-21.1
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
274
G6
268
G7
271
G8
285
+3.6
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
227
G5
236
G6
209
G7
217
G8
226
-2.1
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
285
G4
265
G5
261
G6
244
G7
273
G11
228
-5.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
262
G4
235
G5
266
G6
267
G11
264
+1.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
242
G4
225
G5
250
G11
265
+3.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
231
G4
260
G8
235
-1.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
208
G7
G8
191
-3.4
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
200
G7
238
G8
250
+25.2
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
G6
172
G7
222
+49.7
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
219
G5
192
G6
179
-20.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
200
G4
209
G5
191
-4.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
195
G4
248
+52.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
196
Math · started 11th in 2015
G11
178
Math · started 11th in 2016
G11
208
Math · started 11th in 2017
G11
192
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
213
G11
221
+2.9
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
252
G8
232
G11
248
+0.4
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
226
G7
232
G8
170
-28.0
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
G6
240
G7
221
G8
246
+3.2
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
204
G5
196
G6
168
G7
191
G8
169
-7.3
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
235
G4
219
G5
231
G6
228
G7
242
G11
+2.4
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
242
G4
187
G5
228
G6
233
G11
159
-8.3
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
213
G4
208
G5
225
G11
141
-9.7
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
274
G4
260
G8
181
-18.9
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
216
G7
G8
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
200
G7
253
G8
200
+0.1
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
G6
180
G7
200
+19.7
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
204
G5
157
G6
200
-1.9
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
200
G4
195
G5
152
-23.8
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
213
G4
239
+26.0
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
217

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
-0.63 (95% CI: -0.70 to -0.56)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
76.1
FRL %
47.3%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$109,648
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
33.7%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →