Rieke Elementary School

Portland, OR · Grades K–5

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

#118 of 462

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

★ Above Expected

#252 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Top 5% achievement

#3 of 462

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

#4 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school performs roughly as expected for its context.

Data confidence:High312 students tested 8 years100% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #118 of 462

in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Raw test scores rank this school #3, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #118.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • LowStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • StrongEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%98+16.8
Students gain ground year over year 30%11-11.8
Equity within the school 15%84+5.1
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%100+5.0

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (462 schools)#3#118
OR (882 schools)#4#252
Among similar schools (6 peers)#1#2

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
279
Free/reduced-price lunch
41.6%
Student-teacher ratio
21.5:1
Locale
City, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$131,750ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
91.8
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Portland SD 1J: #26 of 74.Top-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard8%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard8%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)20%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard64%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Ida B. Wells-Barnett High School Rankings coming soon.
Gray Middle School#70#148High
Capitol Hill Elementary School#62#77Medium
Portland Village School#168#246Medium
The Cottonwood School of Civics and Science#112#167High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Chief Joseph Elementary School#83#317Medium
Warrenton High School Rankings coming soon.
The Ivy School#175#376High
Stephenson Elementary School#11#130High
Abernethy Elementary School#9#10High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#3#118
2024#3#174
2023#7#184

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 962024: percentile 982025: percentile 98

Holding steady

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +1.1 pct/yr (95% CI -8.4 to 10.6)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 38 proficiency points by 5th grade — declining about 12× faster than the metro median.

Based on 16 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -12.4 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -18.0 to -6.8)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
300
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
321
G5
295
-25.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
353
G4
327
G5
315
-18.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
362
G4
339
G5
330
-16.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
342
G4
300
G5
300
-20.8
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
321
G4
294
-26.8
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
316
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
332
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
347
G5
342
-5.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
337
G4
339
G5
348
+5.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
347
G4
345
-2.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
342
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
237
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
288
G5
274
-13.7
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
322
G4
314
G5
289
-16.5
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
350
G4
318
G5
316
-17.0
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
313
G4
271
G5
273
-19.8
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
294
G4
279
-15.1
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
302
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
319
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
318
G5
326
+8.4
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
325
G4
331
G5
339
+6.9
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
339
G4
331
-7.7
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
338

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+1.18 (95% CI: +1.16 to +1.21)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
91.8
FRL %
41.6%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$131,750
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
72.7%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →