Sunnyside Environmental School

Portland, OR · Grades K–8

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Middle 40% decoded

#143 of 430

plausibly #55–237

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Performing as Expected

#252 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Top 30% achievement

#94 of 430

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

#103 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Students score highly and the school stands above what its context predicts, but students still tend to lose ground relative to peers while enrolled.

Data confidence:Medium596 students tested 7 years90% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #143 of 430

in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Raw test scores rank this school #94, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #143.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • Below averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Below averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • Thin dataDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%91+14.3
Students gain ground year over year 30%34-4.7
Equity within the school 15%33-2.5
Direction over recent years · thin data10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%90+4.0

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (430 schools)#94#143
OR (667 schools)#103#252
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#3

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
447
Free/reduced-price lunch
30.2%
Student-teacher ratio
18.6:1
Locale
City, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$95,411ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
70.1
Assessment data year
2024
CCD year
2023
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Portland SD 1J: #27 of 70.Top-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Two distinct groups are visible: a strong cluster at the top and a struggling cluster at the bottom.

  • Level 1 — Below standard20%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard25%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)26%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard30%

Why this matters. A bimodal distribution often reflects two student populations served side-by-side (for example a gifted or honors track alongside a general-population cohort). Aggregate scores can hide this. Look at the school's program mix when comparing.

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Hosford Middle School#125#397Medium
Richmond Elementary School#28#141High
da Vinci Middle School#150#213Medium
Glencoe Elementary School#38#69High
Le Monde French Immersion Public Charter School#13#7High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Edgewood Community Elementary School#4#8Medium
Philomath High School Rankings coming soon.
Portland Village School#127#122High
da Vinci Middle School#150#213Medium
Beavercreek Elementary School#261#239High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2024#94#143

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not enough years yet

Trajectory will appear with 2025-26 data once we have two or more years of rankings for this school.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2023 lost 23 proficiency points by 4th grade — declining about 8× faster than the metro median.

Based on 26 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -7.5 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -13.0 to -2.1)

Medium confidence

Cohort 2015201620172018201920232024 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
296
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
271
G8
300
+29.0
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
245
G7
281
G8
288
+21.7
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
274
G6
291
G7
284
G8
264
-3.7
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
305
G5
311
G6
281
G7
273
G8
278
-9.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
289
G4
291
G5
298
G6
269
G7
257
-8.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
289
G4
266
G5
302
G6
272
-1.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
302
G4
307
G5
305
+1.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
271
G4
277
G8
234
-8.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
280
G7
255
G8
238
-7.9
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
256
G7
260
+4.2
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
294
G6
279
-15.6
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
272
G5
270
-2.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
316
G4
293
-23.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
304
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
256
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
275
G8
258
-16.8
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
227
G7
262
G8
260
+16.5
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
286
G6
271
G7
269
G8
200
-26.0
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
284
G5
295
G6
258
G7
255
G8
227
-15.4
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
276
G4
291
G5
266
G6
229
G7
218
-17.9
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
279
G4
269
G5
258
G6
227
-16.9
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
277
G4
254
G5
247
-15.1
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
255
G4
247
G8
204
-10.5
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
212
G7
240
G8
212
+2.0
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
239
G7
231
-7.9
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
270
G6
251
-18.8
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
279
G5
253
-26.2
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
292
G4
310
+18.3
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
289

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.74 (95% CI: +0.71 to +0.77)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
70.1
FRL %
30.2%
ELL %
2.5% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
23.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$95,411
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
70.7%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2023–24 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2023
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
July 26, 2026
Methodology version
0.9.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →