Cedar Ridge Middle School

Sandy, OR · Grades 6–8

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 5% decoded

#5 of 430

plausibly #4–13

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

★★★ Exceptional

#12 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#202 of 430

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

#261 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw scores are modest, but the school outperforms what its context predicts, and students tend to gain ground relative to peers while enrolled.

Data confidence:High835 students tested 7 years96% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #5 of 430

in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Raw test scores rank this school #202, but after accounting for context, students here outperform what the data would predict. The Decoded Rank places it at #5.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • StrongStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Above averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%84+12.0
Students gain ground year over year 30%97+14.0
Equity within the school 15%73+3.5
Direction over recent years 10%100+5.0
Most students were tested 10%96+4.6

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (430 schools)#202#5
OR (667 schools)#261#12
Among similar schools (6 peers)#3#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
439
Free/reduced-price lunch
52.6%
Student-teacher ratio
23.1:1
Locale
Town, fringe
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$97,895ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
69.7
Assessment data year
2024
CCD year
2023
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Oregon Trail SD 46: #1 of 7.Top quintile in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard30%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard30%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)29%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard11%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Sandy Grade School#129#97High
Sandy High School Rankings coming soon.
Kelso Elementary School#131#321Medium
Firwood Elementary School#128#325High
Oregon Trail Academy Rankings coming soon.

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Estacada Middle School#347#100Medium
Howard Eccles Elementary School#279#166High
Elk Meadow Elementary School#19#33Medium
Boring Middle School#160#127High
Pleasant Hill Elementary School Rankings coming soon.

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2024#202#5
2023#194#26

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 572024: percentile 84

Trending up

Based on 2 years (2023–2024).

Slope: +27.0 pct/yr (no CI — too few years)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 6th grade here in 2023 gained 3 proficiency points by 7th grade — gaining while the typical metro school declined.

Based on 14 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +11.0 proficiency points/yr (95% CI 5.1 to 16.9)

Medium confidence

Cohort 2015201620172018201920232024 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
265
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
254
G8
274
+19.5
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
232
G7
246
G8
261
+14.3
ELA · started 6th in 2016
G6
226
G7
239
G8
257
+15.6
ELA · started 6th in 2017
G6
262
G7
272
G8
271
+4.7
ELA · started 6th in 2018
G6
286
G7
284
-2.5
ELA · started 6th in 2019
G6
267
ELA · started 8th in 2023
G8
238
ELA · started 7th in 2023
G7
255
G8
245
-10.8
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
237
G7
239
+2.7
ELA · started 6th in 2024
G6
241
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
243
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
254
G8
259
+5.6
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
191
G7
225
G8
246
+27.7
Math · started 6th in 2016
G6
197
G7
253
G8
253
+27.9
Math · started 6th in 2017
G6
217
G7
254
G8
257
+19.8
Math · started 6th in 2018
G6
263
G7
271
+8.2
Math · started 6th in 2019
G6
252
Math · started 8th in 2023
G8
215
Math · started 7th in 2023
G7
205
G8
217
+11.7
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
193
G7
190
-3.4
Math · started 6th in 2024
G6
207

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.55 (95% CI: +0.52 to +0.58)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
69.7
FRL %
52.6%
ELL %
14.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
21.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$97,895
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
37.9%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2023–24 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2023
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
July 26, 2026
Methodology version
0.9.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →