Faulconer-Chapman School

Sheridan, OR · Grades K–8

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

2½ stars

OR statewide rating — the rank below is this school's statewide position

Middle 40% decoded

#449 of 680

plausibly #334–553

Oregon schools

#230 · Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro metro — Oregon side

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 15% achievement

#594 of 680

Oregon schools

#309 · Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro metro — Oregon side

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Scores look modest, and the school performs below what its context predicts.

Data confidence:High672 students tested 9 years98% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #449 of 680

in Oregon schools

Raw test scores rank this school #594, but after accounting for context, students here outperform what the data would predict. The Decoded Rank places it at #449.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • LowPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 39% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 33% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • StrongEquity within the schoolCounts for 17% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 11% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 39%6-17.0
Students gain ground year over year 33%56+2.1
Equity within the school 17%93+7.2
Most students were tested 11%98+5.3

Note: this school's Alpha-only Decoded Rank is #327 (vs the composite #449). The composite includes equity-within and other signals that diverge from the context-adjusted Alpha. See methodology.

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

Strongest Subjects (Decoded)

Decoded rank first; achievement rank in parentheses. Sorted by decoded rank, best first. Science is shown for reference only and is not part of any rank, tier, or composite.

  1. Science

    2025 proficiency11.7%meeting standard

    Tested gradeGrades 5, 8

    102 tested

    202211.4%20236.3%20247.8%202511.7%

    Shown for reference only — science is not part of any rank.

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
OR (680 schools)#594#449
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (345 schools)#309#230
Among similar schools (6 peers)#6#6

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
515
Free/reduced-price lunch
83.1%
Student-teacher ratio
24.5:1
Locale
Town, distant
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$57,676ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
12.0%ACS tract proxy
SES index
26.3
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Sheridan SD 48J: #1 of 1. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard54%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard26%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)16%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard4%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Sheridan High SchoolRanking unavailable
Sheridan AllPrep Academy—#153Est. #129Low
Willamina High SchoolRanking unavailable
Willamina Middle SchoolRankings coming soon
Willamina Elementary SchoolRankings coming soon

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Kalmiopsis Elementary School#1#2High
North Bend Middle School#3#3Medium
Joseph Lane Middle School#2#3High
Crooked River Elementary School#7#11Medium
Hoover Elementary School#1#6High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#309#230
2024#303#194
2023#248#107

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not used in the Decoded Rank — shown for context only.

No clear trend

The year-to-year data is too variable to support a trend in either direction.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2023 gained 24 proficiency points by 5th grade — gaining while the typical metro school declined.

Based on 27 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +2.2 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -0.8 to 5.2)

Cohort 201520162017201820192022202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
197
—
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
182
G8
184
+2.2
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
173
G7
171
G8
176
+1.6
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
161
G6
147
G7
167
G8
162
+2.2
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
173
G5
184
G6
175
G7
203
G8
195
+6.3
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
167
G4
168
G5
196
G6
187
G7
181
+4.8
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
175
G4
165
G5
204
G6
214
+15.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
186
G4
169
G5
209
G8
175
-1.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
194
G4
218
G7
241
G8
200
+2.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
183
G6
170
G7
200
G8
177
+0.5
ELA · started 5th in 2022
G5
207
G6
204
G7
209
G8
189
-4.7
ELA · started 4th in 2022
G4
152
G5
166
G6
169
G7
194
+12.8
ELA · started 3rd in 2022
G3
142
G4
—
G5
184
G6
149
+5.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
180
G4
165
G5
204
+12.1
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
157
G4
153
-4.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
191
—
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
158
—
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
165
G8
179
+14.1
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
184
G7
214
G8
205
+10.6
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
163
G7
190
G8
164
+2.1
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
220
G5
189
G6
235
G7
238
G8
207
+2.2
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
198
G4
204
G5
192
G6
215
G7
228
+7.1
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
192
G4
169
G5
173
G6
219
+8.3
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
204
G4
184
G5
186
G8
137
-12.9
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
190
G4
192
G7
215
G8
171
-0.7
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
207
G6
185
G7
189
G8
125
-12.9
Math · started 5th in 2022
G5
156
G6
214
G7
185
G8
138
-8.3
Math · started 6th in 2024
G6
179
G7
172
-6.4
Math · started 3rd in 2022
G3
—
G5
147
G6
152
+4.2
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
—
G5
159
—
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
163
G4
151
-11.9
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
184
—

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality. Its reliability shows up on the page as the confidence label and the rank interval, not as a standalone statistic.

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
26.3
FRL %
83.1%
ELL %
2.5% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
18.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$57,676
Tract poverty rate
12.0%
Tract % bachelor's+
14.2%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
September 4, 2026
Methodology version
0.14.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →