Pleasant Valley Middle

Vancouver, WA · Grades 5–8

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

3 stars

WA statewide rating — the rank below is this school's statewide position

Middle 40% decoded

#853 of 1506

plausibly #594–996

Washington schools

#28 · Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro metro — Washington side

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#816 of 1506

Washington schools

#47 · Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro metro — Washington side

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Scores look modest, yet students tend to gain ground relative to peers the longer they are enrolled.

Data confidence:High886 students tested 9 years99% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #853 of 1506

in Washington schools

Raw test scores rank this school #816, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #853.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • LowPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 39% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • Above averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 33% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Above averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 17% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 11% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 39%15-13.7
Students gain ground year over year 33%69+6.4
Equity within the school 17%70+3.3
Most students were tested 11%99+5.4

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

Strongest Subjects (Decoded)

Decoded rank first; achievement rank in parentheses. Sorted by decoded rank, best first. Science is shown for reference only and is not part of any rank, tier, or composite.

  1. Science

    2025 proficiency47%meeting standard

    Tested gradeGrades 5, 8

    224 tested

    202255.2%202354%202452.7%202547%

    Shown for reference only — science is not part of any rank.

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
WA (1506 schools)#816#853
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (96 schools)#47#28
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
447
Free/reduced-price lunch
49.2%
Student-teacher ratio
17.9:1
Locale
Suburb, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$144,605ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
3.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
78.1
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Battle Ground School District: #4 of 13.Top-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school are typically spread across proficiency levels.

  • Level 1 — Below standard28%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard26%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)28%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard16%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Pleasant Valley Primary#50#89High
Vancouver iTech Preparatory#31#72Also HS #11High
Salmon Creek Elementary#10#6High
Gaiser Middle School#93#95High
Laurin Middle School#72#80Medium

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Sacajawea Elementary#31#45High
Crescent Heights Elementary School#264#339High
Cougar Creek Elementary School#448#455High
Fryelands Elementary#356#356High
College Place High School#2#3HSHS outcomeHS pool

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#47#28
2024#50#39
2023#43#39

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not used in the Decoded Rank — shown for context only.

No clear trend

The year-to-year data is too variable to support a trend in either direction.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 5th grade here in 2024 gained 23 proficiency points by 6th grade — gaining while the typical metro school declined.

Based on 24 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +5.4 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -1.3 to 12.1)

Medium confidence

Cohort 201520162017201820192022202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
279
—
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
247
G8
275
+28.2
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
229
G7
270
G8
290
+30.5
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
266
G6
239
G7
262
G8
280
+6.3
ELA · started 5th in 2016
G5
290
G6
248
G7
247
G8
261
-8.9
ELA · started 5th in 2017
G5
260
G6
239
G7
237
-11.9
ELA · started 5th in 2018
G5
268
G6
245
-23.2
ELA · started 5th in 2019
G5
262
G8
269
+2.3
ELA · started 7th in 2022
G7
235
G8
242
+7.7
ELA · started 6th in 2022
G6
224
G7
251
G8
232
+4.2
ELA · started 5th in 2022
G5
255
G6
232
G7
251
G8
255
+2.0
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
227
G6
230
G7
261
+16.9
ELA · started 5th in 2024
G5
216
G6
238
+22.8
ELA · started 5th in 2025
G5
224
—
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
265
—
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
229
G8
266
+36.5
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
223
G7
247
G8
287
+32.0
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
274
G6
220
G7
244
G8
284
+5.6
Math · started 5th in 2016
G5
293
G6
254
G7
239
G8
273
-7.5
Math · started 5th in 2017
G5
262
G6
221
G7
224
-18.9
Math · started 5th in 2018
G5
263
G6
252
-10.8
Math · started 5th in 2019
G5
243
G8
241
-0.7
Math · started 7th in 2022
G7
217
G8
241
+23.9
Math · started 6th in 2022
G6
218
G7
234
G8
219
+0.6
Math · started 5th in 2022
G5
213
G6
232
G7
236
G8
236
+7.2
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
211
G6
214
G7
235
+12.0
Math · started 5th in 2024
G5
199
G6
218
+18.6
Math · started 5th in 2025
G5
200
—

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality. Its reliability shows up on the page as the confidence label and the rank interval, not as a standalone statistic.

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
78.1
FRL %
49.2%
ELL %
14.6% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
SPED %
16.9% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$144,605
Tract poverty rate
3.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
43.6%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
September 4, 2026
Methodology version
0.14.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →