Central Point SD 6 — Decoded Rankings
7 of 12 schools ranked · Updated 2026-07-26
District profile
- Total enrollment
- 2,910
- Free/reduced lunch
- 79.0%
- Avg SES index
- 48.9
- State
- OR
Schools in Central Point SD 6
Elementary / Middle Schools (6 ranked)
| Scenic Middle SchoolNeighborhoodCentral Point SD 6 | #15 | #5 | ★★Outperforming Expectations | Medium | |
| Sams Valley Elementary SchoolNeighborhoodCentral Point SD 6 | #8 | #7 | ★Strong by Both Measures | High | |
| Hanby Middle SchoolNeighborhoodCentral Point SD 6 | #20 | #27 | Typical Profile | High | |
| Central Point Elementary SchoolNeighborhoodCentral Point SD 6 | #18 | #29 | Typical Profile | Medium | |
| Richardson Elementary SchoolNeighborhoodCentral Point SD 6 | #17 | #32 | Typical Profile | High | |
| Jewett Elementary SchoolNeighborhoodCentral Point SD 6 | #23 | #33 | Typical Profile | High |
High Schools (1 ranked)
| Crater High SchoolNeighborhoodCentral Point SD 6 | #6 | #7HS | HS outcome | HS pool |
Story type breakdown
- 1Outperforming Expectations
- 1Strong by Both Measures
- 0High Scores, Context Matters
- 4Typical Profile
- 0Lower by Both Measures
How this district compares
District-level averages relative to the Medford, OR metro median.
| Measure | District avg | Metro median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg achievement percentile (metro) | 54.8 | 50 | 4.8 points above the metro median |
| Avg decoded percentile (metro) | 39.5 | 50 | 10.5 points below the metro median |
| Avg rank shift (places gained after context) | -5.3 | 0 | Schools lose 5.3 places on average after context. |
Data & sources
- Assessment data
- 2024–25 school year
- NCES CCD vintage
- 2024
- Census ACS 5-year vintage
- 2020-2024
- Last updated
- July 26, 2026
- Methodology version
- 0.9.0
Source files (3)
- NCES CCD 2024 directory (Urban Institute) (accessed 2026-07-26)
- ACS 5-year 2020-2024 (accessed 2026-07-26)
- Oregon OSAS 2024-25 school-level results (accessed 2026-07-26)
SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →