Lorna Byrne Middle School

Cave Junction, OR · Grades 5–8

Grants Pass, OR

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

Small comparison pool (19 schools) — interpret with caution

Grants Pass, OR schools

★ Above Expected

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 30% achievement

Small comparison pool (19 schools) — interpret with caution

Grants Pass, OR schools

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw scores understate this school's performance; its decoded rank is substantially higher.

Data confidence:High612 students tested 8 years98% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #5 of 19

in Grants Pass, OR schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • Above averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Above averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%63+4.6
Students gain ground year over year 30%53+0.8
Equity within the school 15%79+4.3
Direction over recent years 10%100+5.0
Most students were tested 10%98+4.8

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Grants Pass, OR (19 schools)#15#5
OR (882 schools)#562#48
Among similar schools (6 peers)#3#2

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
349
Free/reduced-price lunch
90.5%
Student-teacher ratio
29.1:1
Locale
Rural, distant
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$39,782ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.2%ACS tract proxy
SES index
10.2
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Three Rivers/Josephine County SD: #3 of 12.Top-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard42%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard25%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)24%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard9%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Kalmiopsis Community Arts High School Rankings coming soon.
Evergreen Elementary School#17#3High
Illinois Valley High School Rankings coming soon.
Hidden Valley High School Rankings coming soon.
Williams Elementary School#1#7Low

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Sam Case Elementary Rankings coming soon.
Desert View Elementary School#1#1High
Kennedy Elementary School#72#19Medium
Nyssa High School Rankings coming soon.
Coquille Junior Senior High#11#13Medium

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#15#5
2024#18#10
2023#18#14

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 262024: percentile 532025: percentile 63

Trending up

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +18.4 pct/yr (95% CI -39.5 to 76.3)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 5th grade here in 2016 lost 5 proficiency points by 8th grade — gaining faster than the metro median.

Based on 20 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +5.8 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -0.1 to 11.7)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
251
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
228
G8
247
+19.0
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
171
G7
210
G8
199
+13.9
ELA · started 6th in 2016
G6
225
G7
215
G8
245
+10.1
ELA · started 5th in 2016
G5
220
G6
195
G7
210
G8
214
-0.1
ELA · started 5th in 2017
G5
211
G6
179
G7
194
-8.6
ELA · started 5th in 2018
G5
212
G6
207
-5.5
ELA · started 5th in 2019
G5
181
ELA · started 8th in 2023
G8
233
ELA · started 7th in 2023
G7
205
G8
239
+33.8
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
197
G7
233
G8
245
+23.8
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
181
G6
203
G7
248
+33.6
ELA · started 5th in 2024
G5
186
G6
207
+21.2
ELA · started 5th in 2025
G5
193
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
187
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
191
G8
181
-9.8
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
173
G7
160
G8
-13.7
Math · started 6th in 2016
G6
192
G7
175
G8
184
-3.9
Math · started 5th in 2016
G5
201
G6
170
G7
188
G8
169
-7.9
Math · started 5th in 2017
G5
174
G6
157
G7
170
-2.3
Math · started 5th in 2018
G5
173
G6
170
-3.4
Math · started 5th in 2019
G5
152
Math · started 8th in 2023
G8
173
Math · started 7th in 2023
G7
191
G8
179
-12.6
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
160
G7
199
G8
161
+0.1
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
151
G6
156
G7
205
+27.4
Math · started 5th in 2024
G5
156
G6
152
-3.6
Math · started 5th in 2025
G5
192

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.29 (95% CI: +0.24 to +0.34)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
10.2
FRL %
90.5%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$39,782
Tract poverty rate
0.2%
Tract % bachelor's+
16.4%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →