Gilchrist Junior/Senior High School

Gilchrist, OR · Grades 7–12

Klamath Falls, OR

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Middle 40% decoded

Insufficient data for a comparable rank

Klamath Falls, OR schools

Performing as Expected

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

Insufficient data for a comparable rank

Klamath Falls, OR schools

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw achievement and decoded performance are both close to expected for this school's context.

Low data confidence — interpret these rankings carefully. Small samples or low participation reduce how strongly the data supports the result.

Data confidence:Low37 students tested 8 years95% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #10 of 22

in Klamath Falls, OR schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • Below averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • StrongStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Above averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • LowDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%32-6.4
Students gain ground year over year 30%86+10.9
Equity within the school 15%68+2.7
Direction over recent years 10%0-5.0
Most students were tested 10%95+4.5

Note: this school's Alpha-only Decoded Rank is #16 (vs the composite #10). The composite includes cohort progression and other signals that diverge from the context-adjusted Alpha. See methodology.

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Klamath Falls, OR (22 schools)#15#10
OR (882 schools)#652#171
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#2

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
105
Free/reduced-price lunch
98.1%
Student-teacher ratio
9.5:1
Locale
Rural, remote
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$57,500ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.2%ACS tract proxy
SES index
18.0
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

High School Outcomes

Latest available data

Graduation 2025 · Coursework 2021 · AP exams 2015 · SAT/ACT 2021

Graduation
80%
2025 cohort · 69% extended · 10 students in cohort
9th-grade on-track
93%
15 in cohort · SY 2024-25
Advanced options
Dual credit
3 students in advanced math · CRDC 2021

Data limitations

  • Graduation uses state cohort data. Coursework, offerings, and SAT/ACT counts use the latest available federal CRDC extracts, which can lag current graduation data.
  • SAT/ACT data is count-only in this extract; without an enrollment denominator, we do not treat it as a participation rate.
  • HS Decoded Rank is alpha-only: it summarizes how the school's grade 10/11 test scores compare to expectations from its demographic context, ranked against other HSs in the same metro / state / rural cohort. Graduation, AP, and SAT/ACT data above are descriptive context — they are not yet blended into the composite rank.

Within Klamath County SD: #8 of 17.Middle quintile in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard47%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard25%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)20%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard8%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Gilchrist Elementary School#14#16Medium
Chiloquin Elementary School#19#20High
Chiloquin High School#21#17Medium
Gearhart Elementary School Rankings coming soon.
Pelican Elementary School#5#18High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Applegate Elementary School#15#35Medium
Jane Goodall Environmental Middle Charter School#12#7Medium
William P Lord High School Rankings coming soon.
Kalapuya High School Rankings coming soon.
South Wasco County Elementary School Rankings coming soon.

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#15#10
2024#18#11
2023#18#7

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 592024: percentile 452025: percentile 32

Trending down sharply

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: -13.6 pct/yr (95% CI -13.6 to -13.6)

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 7th grade here in 2015 gained 7 proficiency points by 8th grade.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: +10.3 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -7.8 to 28.3)

Low confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 11th in 2015
G11
294
ELA · started 11th in 2016
G11
269
ELA · started 11th in 2017
G11
293
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
214
G11
307
+30.9
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
214
G8
221
G11
+7.1
ELA · started 7th in 2016
G7
150
G8
150
-0.2
ELA · started 7th in 2017
G7
127
G8
209
+82.0
ELA · started 7th in 2018
G7
193
G8
167
-26.1
ELA · started 7th in 2019
G7
228
G11
ELA · started 11th in 2024
G11
220
ELA · started 11th in 2025
G11
236
ELA · started 8th in 2023
G8
179
ELA · started 7th in 2023
G7
G8
ELA · started 7th in 2024
G7
187
G8
ELA · started 7th in 2025
G7
184
Math · started 11th in 2015
G11
206
Math · started 11th in 2016
G11
163
Math · started 11th in 2017
G11
236
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
177
G11
207
+9.9
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
200
G8
200
G11
+0.5
Math · started 7th in 2016
G7
132
G8
133
+1.8
Math · started 7th in 2017
G7
136
G8
146
+9.1
Math · started 7th in 2018
G7
G8
121
Math · started 7th in 2019
G7
183
G11
Math · started 11th in 2024
G11
160
Math · started 11th in 2025
G11
165
Math · started 8th in 2023
G8
Math · started 7th in 2023
G7
G8
Math · started 7th in 2024
G7
144
G8
Math · started 7th in 2025
G7
161

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
-0.06 (95% CI: -0.14 to +0.02)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
18.0
FRL %
98.1%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$57,500
Tract poverty rate
0.2%
Tract % bachelor's+
17.3%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →