Daly Middle School

Lakeview, OR · Grades 7–8

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

3½ stars

OR statewide rating — the rank below is this school's statewide position

Middle 40% decoded

#312 of 680

plausibly #114–534

Oregon schools

#5 · rural Oregon

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 30% achievement

#488 of 680

Oregon schools

#7 · rural Oregon

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school performs roughly as expected for its context.

Data confidence:High221 students tested 9 years95% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #312 of 680

in Oregon schools

Raw test scores rank this school #488, but after accounting for context, students here outperform what the data would predict. The Decoded Rank places it at #312.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • About averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 39% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 33% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • About averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 17% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 11% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 39%55+2.1
Students gain ground year over year 33%50+0.1
Equity within the school 17%51+0.2
Most students were tested 11%95+5.0

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

Strongest Subjects (Decoded)

Decoded rank first; achievement rank in parentheses. Sorted by decoded rank, best first. Science is shown for reference only and is not part of any rank, tier, or composite.

  1. Science

    2025 proficiency17.5%meeting standard

    Tested gradeGrade 8

    57 tested

    202213.6%202315.8%202425.6%202517.5%

    Shown for reference only — science is not part of any rank.

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
OR (680 schools)#488#312
Within Rural Oregon (9 schools)#7#5

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
126
Free/reduced-price lunch
83.3%
Student-teacher ratio
25.2:1
Locale
Rural, remote
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$70,150ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
11.5%ACS tract proxy
SES index
38.9
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard46%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard27%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)19%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard9%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

No nearby schools have been ranked yet.

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Nehalem Elementary SchoolRanking unavailable
Optimum Learning Environment Charter School#11#44Medium
Albany Options SchoolRank withheld
Adrian Elementary School#1#3High
Liberty Elementary SchoolRankings coming soon

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025Excluded

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not used in the Decoded Rank — shown for context only.

Not enough years yet

Trajectory will appear once we have two or more years of rankings for this school.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 7th grade here in 2024 lost 13 proficiency points by 8th grade.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: -4.7 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -15.8 to 6.4)

Low confidence

Cohort 201520162017201820192022202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
239
—
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
230
G8
261
+30.4
ELA · started 7th in 2016
G7
237
G8
250
+13.3
ELA · started 7th in 2017
G7
226
G8
240
+14.1
ELA · started 7th in 2018
G7
279
G8
261
-17.7
ELA · started 7th in 2019
G7
258
—
ELA · started 8th in 2022
G8
226
—
ELA · started 7th in 2022
G7
235
G8
223
-11.2
ELA · started 7th in 2023
G7
218
G8
203
-15.3
ELA · started 7th in 2024
G7
205
G8
191
-13.2
ELA · started 7th in 2025
G7
189
—
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
215
—
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
212
G8
234
+21.6
Math · started 7th in 2016
G7
231
G8
181
-49.6
Math · started 7th in 2017
G7
196
G8
208
+11.7
Math · started 7th in 2018
G7
250
G8
237
-13.4
Math · started 7th in 2019
G7
246
—
Math · started 8th in 2022
G8
192
—
Math · started 7th in 2022
G7
212
G8
204
-7.9
Math · started 7th in 2023
G7
211
G8
200
-11.1
Math · started 7th in 2024
G7
212
G8
190
-22.7
Math · started 7th in 2025
G7
191
—

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality. Its reliability shows up on the page as the confidence label and the rank interval, not as a standalone statistic.

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
38.9
FRL %
83.3%
ELL %
8.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
24.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$70,150
Tract poverty rate
11.5%
Tract % bachelor's+
24.1%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
September 4, 2026
Methodology version
0.14.0
Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →