Crestview Heights School

Waldport, OR · Grades K–6

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

#21 of 77

rural Oregon schools

Performing as Expected

#180 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#35 of 77

rural Oregon schools

#473 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Decoded performance is roughly in line with expectations for this school's context.

Data confidence:Medium295 students tested 8 years94% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #21 of 77

in rural Oregon schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • About averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • StrongStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Below averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%60+3.4
Students gain ground year over year 30%89+11.8
Equity within the school 15%26-3.6
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%94+4.4

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Within Rural Oregon (77 schools)#35#21
OR (882 schools)#473#180

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
264
Free/reduced-price lunch
89.4%
Student-teacher ratio
13.2:1
Locale
Rural, fringe
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$61,083ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
28.5
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school are typically spread across proficiency levels.

  • Level 1 — Below standard39%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard28%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)19%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard14%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

No nearby schools have been ranked yet.

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Pioneer School#6#6High
Joseph Charter School Rankings coming soon.
Green Elementary School#14#6High
Highland Elementary School#79#21High
Candalaria Elementary School#8#25High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025Excluded
2024Excluded
2023Excluded

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not enough years yet

Trajectory will appear with 2025-26 data once we have two or more years of rankings for this school.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 gained 48 proficiency points by 6th grade.

Based on 24 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +7.8 proficiency points/yr (95% CI 2.8 to 12.8)

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
246
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
240
G8
226
-13.7
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
239
G7
264
+24.6
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
247
G6
282
+34.2
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
253
G5
271
G6
285
+16.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
228
G4
231
G5
269
G6
276
+18.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
192
G4
206
G5
222
G6
234
+14.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
215
G4
245
G5
254
+19.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
213
G4
221
+7.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
213
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
230
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
240
G6
258
+17.2
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
210
G5
242
G6
250
+19.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
236
G4
204
G5
241
+2.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
222
G4
224
+1.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
191
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
198
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
193
G8
207
+14.2
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
215
G7
232
+17.4
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
222
G6
240
+17.5
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
228
G5
248
G6
217
-5.4
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
219
G4
198
G5
221
G6
220
+2.6
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
194
G4
189
G5
178
G6
157
-12.4
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
191
G4
210
G5
186
-2.3
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
178
G4
200
+21.8
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
179
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
194
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
216
G6
223
+6.5
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
186
G5
176
G6
173
-6.2
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
218
G4
186
G5
185
-16.3
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
200
G4
205
+4.9
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
185

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.13 (95% CI: +0.06 to +0.20)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
28.5
FRL %
89.4%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$61,083
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
20.3%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →