North Powder Charter School

North Powder, OR · Grades K–12 · Charter

La Grande, OR

Charter

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

Small comparison pool (4 schools) — interpret with caution

La Grande, OR schools

★ Above Expected

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

Small comparison pool (4 schools) — interpret with caution

La Grande, OR schools

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw scores understate this school — it stands well above what its student context would predict.

Data confidence:High252 students tested 7 years99% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #2 of 4

in La Grande, OR schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • Above averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Above averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%75+8.8
Students gain ground year over year 30%50+0.0
Equity within the school 15%75+3.8
Direction over recent years 10%100+5.0
Most students were tested 10%99+4.9

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
La Grande, OR (4 schools)#3#2
OR (667 schools)#362#334
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
256
Free/reduced-price lunch
41.8%
Student-teacher ratio
11.1:1
Locale
Rural, remote
School type
Charter school
Enrollment model
Charter enrollment
Neighborhood median income
$65,484ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.2%ACS tract proxy
SES index
37.0
Assessment data year
2024
CCD year
2023
ACS vintage
2020-2024

High School Outcomes

Latest available data

Graduation 2024

HS Decoded Rank #1 of 1 among high schools in this metro

Context-adjusted

Achievement vs. demographic expectation

Top 5%

★★★ Exceptional

Achievement

Raw test performance

Top 5%

This is context-adjusted achievement (Alpha) — how grade 10–11 scores compare to expectations from the school's demographics. It is not the growth-based composite shown for elementary and middle schools, because a single-tested-grade high school has no consecutive-grade cohort to measure growth from.

Proficiency over time↓ declining
  1. 202372%
  2. 202432%

Share of the tested grade (grade 10–11) meeting or exceeding standard in ELA + math, year over year. This is the school's achievement trend for the tested grade — not student growth and not the K-8 cohort-progression signal.

Graduation
100%
2024 cohort · 100% extended · 18 students in cohort
9th-grade on-track
95%
19 in cohort · SY 2023-24

Data limitations

  • Graduation uses state cohort data. Coursework, offerings, and SAT/ACT counts use the latest available federal CRDC extracts, which can lag current graduation data.
  • SAT/ACT data is count-only in this extract; without an enrollment denominator, we do not treat it as a participation rate.
  • HS Decoded Rank is alpha-only: it summarizes how the school's grade 10/11 test scores compare to expectations from its demographic context, ranked against other HSs in the same metro / state / rural cohort. Graduation, AP, and SAT/ACT data above are descriptive context — they are not yet blended into the composite rank. The achievement-vs-decoded quadrant below plots context-adjusted ACHIEVEMENT (alpha) against raw achievement; it is NOT the growth-based composite shown for elementary and middle schools, because a single-tested-grade high school has no consecutive-grade cohort ladder from which to build a growth signal.

Within North Powder SD 8J: #1 of 1. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard35%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard31%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)26%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard8%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Union High School Rankings coming soon.
Union Elementary School Rankings coming soon.
Cove Charter School Rankings coming soon.
Central Elementary School#2#4High
La Grande Middle School#3Est. #2Low

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Warrenton Middle School#5#3Medium
Gaston Jr/Sr High School#377#281Also HS #55Medium
Kathryn Jones Harrison Elementary School#6#11Medium
Tumalo Community School#1#3Medium
Warrenton High School Rankings coming soon.

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2024#3#2
2023#3#3

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 602024: percentile 75

Trending up

Based on 2 years (2023–2024).

Slope: +15.0 pct/yr (no CI — too few years)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2023 lost 23 proficiency points by 4th grade — declining about 3× faster than the metro median.

Based on 26 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -2.7 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -8.4 to 3.1)

Medium confidence

Cohort 2015201620172018201920232024 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
246
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
204
G8
191
-13.3
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
238
G7
261
G8
273
+17.4
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
185
G6
180
G7
228
G8
248
+23.7
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
226
G5
186
G6
187
G7
230
G8
187
-3.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
241
G4
260
G5
252
G6
248
G7
246
G11
-0.1
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
206
G4
190
G5
220
G6
209
G11
227
+3.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
223
G4
248
G5
235
+6.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
200
G4
207
G8
238
+7.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
233
G7
221
G8
218
-3.1
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
223
G7
224
+1.3
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
218
G6
216
-2.1
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
218
G5
200
-17.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
250
G4
227
-23.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
240
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
217
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
188
G8
157
-30.6
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
195
G7
209
G8
218
+11.3
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
156
G6
156
G7
188
G8
188
+13.0
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
222
G5
181
G6
163
G7
161
G8
152
-16.0
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
259
G4
265
G5
243
G6
231
G7
219
G11
278
+1.4
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
188
G4
185
G5
170
G11
163
-2.9
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
209
G4
222
G5
187
-11.1
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
201
G4
232
G8
225
+3.0
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
222
G7
175
G8
182
-9.2
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
211
G7
205
-6.5
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
214
G6
200
-13.7
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
195
G5
148
-47.4
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
255
G4
232
-22.8
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
227

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.06 (95% CI: +0.01 to +0.11)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
37.0
FRL %
41.8%
ELL %
8.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance (Ever English Learners)
SPED %
19.0% · OR ODE At-A-Glance
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$65,484
Tract poverty rate
0.2%
Tract % bachelor's+
17.1%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2023–24 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2023
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
July 26, 2026
Methodology version
0.9.0
Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →