Yoncalla Elementary School

Yoncalla, OR · Grades K–8

Roseburg, OR

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Bottom 30% decoded

#22 of 29

Roseburg, OR schools

Below Expected

#604 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#20 of 29

Roseburg, OR schools

#688 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school ranks below most of its metro on both raw achievement and decoded performance.

Data confidence:Medium208 students tested 8 years94% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #22 of 29

in Roseburg, OR schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • About averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • LowStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • StrongEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%41-3.0
Students gain ground year over year 30%17-9.8
Equity within the school 15%86+5.4
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%94+4.4

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Roseburg, OR (29 schools)#20#22
OR (882 schools)#688#604
Among similar schools (6 peers)#1#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
175
Free/reduced-price lunch
100.0%
Student-teacher ratio
14.6:1
Locale
Rural, remote
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$57,346ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
26.5
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Yoncalla SD 32: #1 of 1. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard46%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard30%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)18%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard6%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Yoncalla High School Rankings coming soon.
North Douglas High School Rankings coming soon.
North Douglas Elementary School Rankings coming soon.
Lincoln Middle School#10#11High
Oakland Elementary School#9#9High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Rosa Parks Elementary School#444#260Medium
Klamath Learning Center Rankings coming soon.
Reynolds Learning Academy Rankings coming soon.
Reynolds Arthur Academy#193#258Medium
Lincoln School of Early Learning Rankings coming soon.

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#20#22
2024#21#25
2023#21#24

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 332024: percentile 272025: percentile 41

Holding steady

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +4.0 pct/yr (95% CI -74.4 to 82.4)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 21 proficiency points by 7th grade.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: -7.1 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -16.0 to 1.8)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2016
G8
216
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
238
G7
209
G8
200
-19.1
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
253
G6
225
G7
239
G8
183
-19.5
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
174
G5
200
G6
206
G7
188
G8
164
-3.1
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
242
G4
229
G5
233
G6
247
G7
221
-2.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
236
G4
237
G5
250
G6
200
-9.3
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
317
G4
286
G5
246
-35.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
186
G4
G8
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
209
G7
G8
225
+3.1
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
194
G7
288
G8
259
+32.4
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
180
G6
164
G7
258
+39.1
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
194
G5
176
G6
174
-10.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
G4
160
G5
138
-22.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
212
G4
163
-49.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
232
Math · started 8th in 2016
G8
195
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
177
G7
183
G8
204
+13.7
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
211
G6
188
G7
206
G8
195
-3.0
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
200
G5
179
G6
200
G7
G8
+0.2
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
226
G4
215
G5
250
G6
207
G7
190
-8.1
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
193
G4
246
G5
217
G6
231
+8.5
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
317
G4
247
G5
200
-58.3
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
186
G4
G8
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
170
G7
G8
150
-4.0
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
171
G7
225
G8
194
+11.8
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
G6
167
G7
158
-8.4
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
G5
163
G6
148
-15.3
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
G4
173
G5
157
-16.8
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
173
G4
163
-10.3
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
200

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
-0.18 (95% CI: -0.29 to -0.07)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
26.5
FRL %
100.0%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$57,346
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
19.4%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →