Catalyst Public Schools

Bremerton, WA · Grades K–9 · Charter

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA

Charter

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Bottom 30% decoded

#39 of 51

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA schools

Below Expected

#1355 in WA

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 30% achievement

#37 of 51

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA schools

#756 in WA

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Both raw achievement and decoded performance rank low for this school.

Data confidence:High598 students tested 3 years96% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #39 of 51

in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • About averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • LowEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%41-3.1
Students gain ground year over year 30%41-2.6
Equity within the school 15%10-6.0
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%96+4.6

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA (51 schools)#37#39
WA (1506 schools)#756#1355
Among similar schools (6 peers)#1#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
504
Free/reduced-price lunch
37.7%
Student-teacher ratio
14.4:1
Locale
City, small
School type
Charter school
Enrollment model
Charter enrollment
Neighborhood median income
$84,602ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
60.3
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

High School Outcomes

Latest available data

Coursework 2021 · AP exams 2015 · SAT/ACT 2021

Advanced options
Not reported
CRDC 2021

Data limitations

  • Graduation uses state cohort data. Coursework, offerings, and SAT/ACT counts use the latest available federal CRDC extracts, which can lag current graduation data.
  • SAT/ACT data is count-only in this extract; without an enrollment denominator, we do not treat it as a participation rate.
  • HS Decoded Rank is alpha-only: it summarizes how the school's grade 10/11 test scores compare to expectations from its demographic context, ranked against other HSs in the same metro / state / rural cohort. Graduation, AP, and SAT/ACT data above are descriptive context — they are not yet blended into the composite rank.

Within Catalyst Public Schools: #1 of 1. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school are broadly spread across proficiency levels.

  • Level 1 — Below standard31%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard23%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)23%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard23%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Mountain View Middle School#51#46Medium
Bremerton High School Rankings coming soon.
Morgan Center School Rankings coming soon.
View Ridge Elementary Arts Academy#47#23High
Naval Avenue Elementary School#42#8Medium

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Thurgood Marshall Elementary#69#140High
Evergreen Primary#246#121High
Chief Umtuch Middle#250#174High
Enumclaw Middle School#345#126Medium
Lakeland Hills Elementary#243#536High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#37#39
2024#26#12
2023#38#32

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 532024: percentile 742025: percentile 41

Trending down

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: -5.9 pct/yr (95% CI -203.5 to 191.8)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2023 lost 5 proficiency points by 5th grade — declining faster than the metro median.

Based on 12 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -3.1 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -9.0 to 2.8)

Medium confidence

Cohort 202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2023
G8
248
ELA · started 7th in 2023
G7
259
G8
262
+3.1
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
202
G7
192
G8
217
+7.5
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
258
G6
264
G7
274
+8.3
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
250
G5
296
G6
252
+1.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
235
G4
237
G5
230
-2.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
255
G4
240
-15.3
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
246
Math · started 8th in 2023
G8
239
Math · started 7th in 2023
G7
245
G8
260
+15.0
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
204
G7
204
G8
193
-5.8
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
242
G6
252
G7
244
+0.6
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
242
G5
257
G6
225
-8.5
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
233
G4
243
G5
207
-13.4
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
257
G4
238
-18.7
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
259

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
-0.14 (95% CI: -0.17 to -0.11)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
60.3
FRL %
37.7%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$84,602
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
43.9%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →