Kitsap Lake Elementary

Bremerton, WA · Grades K–5

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

#14 of 51

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA schools

★ Above Expected

#419 in WA

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Top 30% achievement

#14 of 51

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA schools

#425 in WA

same position as achievement rank

Raw achievement and decoded performance are both close to expected for this school's context.

Data confidence:High322 students tested 8 years100% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #14 of 51

in Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • LowEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%92+14.8
Students gain ground year over year 30%43-2.1
Equity within the school 15%16-5.1
Direction over recent years 10%100+5.0
Most students were tested 10%100+5.0

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA (51 schools)#14#14
WA (1506 schools)#425#419
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
336
Free/reduced-price lunch
46.7%
Student-teacher ratio
14.6:1
Locale
City, small
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$81,133ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
47.8
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Bremerton School District: #2 of 7.Top-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Two distinct groups are visible: a strong cluster at the top and a struggling cluster at the bottom.

  • Level 1 — Below standard21%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard22%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)27%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard30%

Why this matters. A bimodal distribution often reflects two student populations served side-by-side (for example a gifted or honors track alongside a general-population cohort). Aggregate scores can hide this. Look at the school's program mix when comparing.

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
West Sound Technical Skills Center Rankings coming soon.
Crownhill Elementary School#39#45High
Bremerton Homelink Program Rankings coming soon.
Washington Youth Academy Rankings coming soon.
John D. Bud Hawk Elementary at Jackson Park#35#22High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Beacon Avenue Elementary School Rankings coming soon.
Mount Erie Elementary#6#26High
Vaughn Elementary School#382#663High
Reardan Elementary School Rankings coming soon.
Mccleary Elem Rankings coming soon.

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#14#14
2024#30#19
2023#33#21

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 692024: percentile 722025: percentile 92

Trending up

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +11.8 pct/yr (95% CI -49.8 to 73.3)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 18 proficiency points by 5th grade — declining faster than the metro median.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: -3.2 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -11.1 to 4.8)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
259
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
290
G5
294
+3.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
305
G4
300
G5
287
-8.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
279
G4
242
G5
274
-2.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
244
G4
247
G5
273
+14.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
302
G4
276
-25.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
306
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
248
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
218
G5
236
+18.1
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
258
G4
238
G5
292
+17.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
271
G4
276
+4.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
237
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
245
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
312
G5
277
-34.3
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
307
G4
301
G5
286
-10.5
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
295
G4
245
G5
269
-12.8
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
251
G4
244
G5
245
-3.2
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
273
G4
256
-17.3
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
298
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
223
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
241
G5
207
-33.9
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
254
G4
239
G5
291
+18.4
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
271
G4
244
-26.4
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
257

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.52 (95% CI: +0.45 to +0.60)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
47.8
FRL %
46.7%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$81,133
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
30.4%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →