Franklin Elementary

Port Angeles, WA · Grades ?–6

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 15% decoded

#10 of 176

rural Washington schools

Performing as Expected

#76 in WA

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Top 15% achievement

#20 of 176

rural Washington schools

#421 in WA

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school performs roughly as expected for its context.

Data confidence:High294 students tested 8 years98% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #10 of 176

in rural Washington schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • StrongStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Below averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%94+15.3
Students gain ground year over year 30%83+9.9
Equity within the school 15%22-4.3
Direction over recent years 10%100+5.0
Most students were tested 10%98+4.8

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Within Rural Washington (176 schools)#20#10
WA (1506 schools)#421#76

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
318
Free/reduced-price lunch
56.0%
Student-teacher ratio
15.1:1
Locale
Town, remote
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$66,738ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
42.1
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Two distinct groups are visible: a strong cluster at the top and a struggling cluster at the bottom.

  • Level 1 — Below standard21%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard18%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)35%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard25%

Why this matters. A bimodal distribution often reflects two student populations served side-by-side (for example a gifted or honors track alongside a general-population cohort). Aggregate scores can hide this. Look at the school's program mix when comparing.

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

No nearby schools have been ranked yet.

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Castle Rock Middle School#25#16High
Suquamish Elementary School#13#4High
Garden Heights Elementary Rankings coming soon.
Gold Bar Elementary Rankings coming soon.
Kittitas High School Rankings coming soon.

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025Excluded
2024Excluded
2023Excluded

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not enough years yet

Trajectory will appear with 2025-26 data once we have two or more years of rankings for this school.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 10 proficiency points by 6th grade.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: +6.9 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -1.1 to 14.9)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
254
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
247
G6
241
-5.4
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
284
G5
274
G6
270
-6.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
262
G4
256
G5
269
G6
252
-1.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
219
G4
246
G5
228
G6
251
+7.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
263
G4
293
G5
280
+8.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
285
G4
324
+38.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
309
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
245
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
232
G6
238
+6.5
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
238
G5
248
G6
284
+23.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
246
G4
249
G5
237
-4.3
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
253
G4
283
+30.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
255
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
243
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
253
G6
223
-29.3
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
252
G5
256
G6
254
+1.3
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
231
G4
253
G5
242
G6
240
+1.6
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
202
G4
261
G5
214
G6
225
+2.4
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
267
G4
297
G5
269
+0.8
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
298
G4
322
+23.5
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
298
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
223
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
192
G6
238
+46.0
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
228
G5
231
G6
264
+17.7
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
237
G4
246
G5
219
-9.3
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
239
G4
255
+15.3
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
257

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.50 (95% CI: +0.44 to +0.56)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
42.1
FRL %
56.0%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$66,738
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
28.3%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →