Royal Middle School

Royal City, WA · Grades 7–8

Moses Lake, WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

#9 of 35

plausibly #8–14

Moses Lake, WA schools

★ Above Expected

#462 in WA

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#16 of 35

Moses Lake, WA schools

#1198 in WA

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw scores understate this school — it stands well above what its student context would predict.

Data confidence:High548 students tested 8 years98% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #9 of 35

in Moses Lake, WA schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • About averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • About averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%91+14.5
Students gain ground year over year 30%44-1.8
Equity within the school 15%49-0.2
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%98+4.8

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Moses Lake, WA (35 schools)#16#9
WA (1506 schools)#1198#462
Among similar schools (6 peers)#1#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
282
Free/reduced-price lunch
61.0%
Student-teacher ratio
20.1:1
Locale
Rural, remote
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$56,059ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.3%ACS tract proxy
SES index
15.0
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Royal School District: #1 of 3. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school are typically spread across proficiency levels.

  • Level 1 — Below standard41%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard22%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)26%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard9%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Royal High School Rankings coming soon.
Red Rock Elementary#3#11High
Royal Intermediate School#8#15High
George Elementary#29#19Medium
Wahluke High School Rankings coming soon.

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Manson Elementary#17#21High
Lakeridge Elementary School#591#673High
Chelan Middle School#20#10Medium
Marcus Whitman-Cowiche Elementary Rankings coming soon.
Emerald Park Elementary School#452#424High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#16#9
2024#15#5
2023#18#3

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 922024: percentile 912025: percentile 91

Holding steady

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: -0.3 pct/yr (95% CI -4.7 to 4.0)

Medium confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 7th grade here in 2024 gained 6 proficiency points by 8th grade — gaining at about the metro median rate.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: +3.6 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -7.6 to 14.8)

Low confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
211
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
197
G8
231
+34.5
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
175
G7
228
G8
213
+19.2
ELA · started 7th in 2017
G7
204
G8
218
+13.8
ELA · started 7th in 2018
G7
220
G8
203
-16.7
ELA · started 7th in 2019
G7
231
ELA · started 8th in 2023
G8
225
ELA · started 7th in 2023
G7
220
G8
218
-2.3
ELA · started 7th in 2024
G7
220
G8
226
+6.1
ELA · started 7th in 2025
G7
219
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
194
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
204
G8
193
-10.4
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
189
G7
189
G8
204
+7.0
Math · started 7th in 2017
G7
190
G8
221
+30.7
Math · started 7th in 2018
G7
180
G8
183
+3.2
Math · started 7th in 2019
G7
202
Math · started 8th in 2023
G8
179
Math · started 7th in 2023
G7
194
G8
166
-28.5
Math · started 7th in 2024
G7
203
G8
181
-22.0
Math · started 7th in 2025
G7
183

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.59 (95% CI: +0.56 to +0.63)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
15.0
FRL %
61.0%
ELL %
38.7% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
SPED %
13.8% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$56,059
Tract poverty rate
0.3%
Tract % bachelor's+
15.9%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
July 26, 2026
Methodology version
0.9.0
Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →