Eagle Point SD 9 — Decoded Rankings
5 of 11 schools ranked · Updated 2026-07-26
District profile
- Total enrollment
- 1,893
- Free/reduced lunch
- 75.8%
- Avg SES index
- 35.3
- State
- OR
Schools in Eagle Point SD 9
Elementary / Middle Schools (4 ranked)
4 official · 1 unranked (N/A — not yet eligible)
| White Mountain Middle SchoolNeighborhoodEagle Point SD 9 | #32 | #1 | ★★Outperforming Expectations | High | |
| Eagle Point Middle SchoolNeighborhoodEagle Point SD 9 | #11 | #25 | Typical Profile | Medium | |
| Table Rock ElementaryNeighborhoodEagle Point SD 9 | #33 | #28 | Lower by Both Measures | High | |
| Hillside ElementaryNeighborhoodEagle Point SD 9 | #29 | #29 | Lower by Both Measures | High | |
| Unranked (1 not yet eligible for a rank) | |||||
| URCEO-Upper Rogue Center for Educational Opportunities | N/A | N/A | — | Not enough data to rank | |
High Schools (1 ranked)
| Eagle Point High SchoolNeighborhoodEagle Point SD 9 | #9 | #8HS | HS outcome | HS pool |
Story type breakdown
- 1Outperforming Expectations
- 0Strong by Both Measures
- 0High Scores, Context Matters
- 1Typical Profile
- 2Lower by Both Measures
How this district compares
District-level averages relative to the Medford, OR metro median.
| Measure | District avg | Metro median | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg achievement percentile (metro) | 25.7 | 50 | 24.3 points below the metro median |
| Avg decoded percentile (metro) | 41.9 | 50 | 8.1 points below the metro median |
| Avg rank shift (places gained after context) | 5.5 | 0 | Schools gain 5.5 places on average after context. |
Data & sources
- Assessment data
- 2023–24 school year
- NCES CCD vintage
- 2023
- Census ACS 5-year vintage
- 2020-2024
- Last updated
- July 26, 2026
- Methodology version
- 0.9.0
Source files (3)
- NCES CCD 2023 directory (Urban Institute) (accessed 2026-07-26)
- ACS 5-year 2020-2024 (accessed 2026-07-26)
- Oregon OSAS 2023-24 school-level results (accessed 2026-07-26)
SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →