Parklane Elementary School

Portland, OR · Grades K–5

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Bottom 15% decoded

#418 of 462

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Lower Performance

#822 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 15% achievement

#409 of 462

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

#786 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school ranks below most of its metro on both raw achievement and decoded performance.

Data confidence:Medium417 students tested 8 years94% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #418 of 462

in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • LowPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • LowStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • StrongEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%15-12.2
Students gain ground year over year 30%11-11.7
Equity within the school 15%82+4.8
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%94+4.4

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (462 schools)#409#418
OR (882 schools)#786#822
Among similar schools (6 peers)#6#6

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
397
Free/reduced-price lunch
100.0%
Student-teacher ratio
18.0:1
Locale
City, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$72,842ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
32.5
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Centennial SD 28J: #8 of 8.Bottom quintile in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard59%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard20%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)14%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard7%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Oliver Middle#439#309High
Patrick Lynch Elementary#386#172Medium
Alder Elementary School#459#135High
HOLLA School Rankings coming soon.
Glenfair Elementary School#443#244High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Rockwood Preparatory Academy#345#179High
Hillside Elementary#33#36High
Gilbert Heights Elementary School#341#227High
Kelly Elementary School#335#219High
Gervais Elementary School#46#26High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#409#418
2024#405#425
2023#384#432

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 192024: percentile 172025: percentile 15

Holding steady

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: -2.1 pct/yr (95% CI -4.2 to 0.0)

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 18 proficiency points by 6th grade — declining about 8× faster than the metro median.

Based on 18 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -7.6 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -14.3 to -1.0)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
193
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
194
G6
196
+1.9
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
196
G5
190
G6
206
+5.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
204
G4
182
G5
179
G6
186
-5.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
185
G4
153
G5
198
G6
210
+12.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
200
G4
188
G5
190
-5.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
176
G4
141
-34.7
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
177
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
215
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
167
G5
182
+15.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
189
G4
160
G5
157
-16.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
188
G4
161
-26.8
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
183
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
168
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
173
G6
176
+2.9
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
167
G5
162
G6
168
+0.3
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
206
G4
179
G5
159
G6
168
-13.4
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
171
G4
160
G5
182
G6
165
+0.4
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
212
G4
173
G5
158
-27.0
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
153
G4
147
-6.1
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
174
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
166
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
167
G5
150
-17.1
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
172
G4
152
G5
149
-11.3
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
197
G4
171
-25.2
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
188

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
-0.71 (95% CI: -0.74 to -0.68)

SES index components

SES method
ACS tract data only (FRL excluded)
SES index value
32.5
FRL %
100.0% (CEP — direct-certification used instead)
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$72,842
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
17.0%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →