Digital Learning Center

Moses Lake, WA · Grades 6–12

Moses Lake, WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

1½ stars

WA statewide rating — the rank below is this school's statewide position

Bottom 15% decoded

Insufficient data for a comparable rank

Washington schools

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 15% achievement

Insufficient data for a comparable rank

Washington schools

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw scores are low, and the school still trails similar schools even after accounting for context.

Low data confidence — interpret these rankings carefully. Small samples or low participation reduce how strongly the data supports the result.

Data confidence:Low37 students tested 4 years88% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #1351 of 1506

in Washington schools

Raw test scores rank this school #1324, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #1351.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • LowPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 39% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • LowStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 33% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • StrongEquity within the schoolCounts for 17% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 11% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 39%6-17.3
Students gain ground year over year 33%6-14.5
Equity within the school 17%97+7.9
Most students were tested 11%88+4.2

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
WA (1506 schools)#1324#1351
Moses Lake, WA (35 schools)#23#33
Among similar schools (6 peers)#3#2

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
359
Free/reduced-price lunch
66.6%
Student-teacher ratio
29.9:1
Locale
Town, remote
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$82,439ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
8.7%ACS tract proxy
SES index
45.0
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

High School Outcomes

Latest available data

Graduation 2025 · Coursework 2021 · AP exams 2015 · SAT/ACT 2021

HS Decoded Rank #9 of 10 among high schools in this metro

Context-adjusted

Achievement vs. demographic expectation

Bottom tier

2 stars

Achievement

Raw test performance

Middle of the pool

This is context-adjusted achievement (Alpha) — how grade 10–11 scores compare to expectations from the school's demographics. It is not the growth-based composite shown for elementary and middle schools, because a single-tested-grade high school has no consecutive-grade cohort to measure growth from.

Subject performance

Annual share of the tested high-school grade meeting or exceeding the state standard. Science is descriptive and is not included in the ELA + math HS Decoded Rank.

  1. ELA

    2025 proficiency45.1%meeting standard

    Tested gradeGrade 10

    83 tested

    202257.7%202347.4%202445%202545.1%

  2. Math

    2025 proficiency5.8%meeting standard

    Tested gradeGrade 10

    83 tested

    202319.5%202413.8%20255.8%

  3. Science

    Not reported

Proficiency over time↓ declining
  1. 202258%
  2. 202333%
  3. 202429%
  4. 202525%

Share of the tested grade (grade 10–11) meeting or exceeding standard in ELA + math, year over year. This is the school's achievement trend for the tested grade — not student growth and not the K-8 cohort-progression signal.

Graduation
73%
2025 cohort · 78% extended · 132 students in cohort
Advanced options
Not reported
2 students in advanced math · CRDC 2021

Data confidence: Low— tested-student count, years of data, and participation for the high-school grades

Data limitations

  • Graduation uses state cohort data. Coursework, offerings, and SAT/ACT counts use the latest available federal CRDC extracts, which can lag current graduation data.
  • SAT/ACT data is count-only in this extract; without an enrollment denominator, we do not treat it as a participation rate.
  • HS Decoded Rank is alpha-only: it summarizes how the school's grade 10/11 test scores compare to expectations from its demographic context, ranked against other HSs in the same metro / state / rural cohort. Graduation, AP, and SAT/ACT data above are descriptive context — they are not yet blended into the composite rank. The achievement-vs-decoded quadrant below plots context-adjusted ACHIEVEMENT (alpha) against raw achievement; it is NOT the growth-based composite shown for elementary and middle schools, because a single-tested-grade high school has no consecutive-grade cohort ladder from which to build a growth signal.

Within Moses Lake School District: #14 of 15.Bottom quintile in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard43%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard30%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)23%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard4%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Moses Lake High School#3#7HSHS outcomeHS pool
MLSD Open Doors Re-Engagement ProgramRanking unavailable
Garden Heights Elementary#13#29High
Columbia Middle School#10#18High
Vanguard Academy#10#8HSHS outcomeHS pool

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Lacey Elementary#47#37High
Nob Hill Elementary School#15#38High
Elmhurst Elementary School#596#451High
Mann Elementary School#398#285High
Hoquiam Middle School#21#19High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#23#33
2023Excluded

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not used in the Decoded Rank — shown for context only.

Not enough years yet

Trajectory will appear once we have two or more years of rankings for this school.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 8th grade here in 2023 gained 41 proficiency points by 10th grade — gaining about 6× the metro median rate.

Based on 2 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +14.7 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -6.2 to 35.7)

Low confidence

Cohort 2022202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 10th in 2022
G10
258
—
ELA · started 10th in 2023
G10
239
—
ELA · started 10th in 2024
G10
237
—
ELA · started 8th in 2023
G8
189
G10
230
+20.3
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
210
G8
208
-1.0
ELA · started 6th in 2025
G6
200
—
Math · started 10th in 2023
G10
161
—
Math · started 10th in 2024
G10
148
—
Math · started 10th in 2025
G10
139
—

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality. Its reliability shows up on the page as the confidence label and the rank interval, not as a standalone statistic.

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
45.0
FRL %
66.6%
ELL %
9.8% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
SPED %
13.6% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$82,439
Tract poverty rate
8.7%
Tract % bachelor's+
38.1%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
September 4, 2026
Methodology version
0.14.0
Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →