Washington Middle School

Seattle, WA · Grades 6–8

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

#142 of 680

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA schools

★ Above Expected

#293 in WA

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Middle 40% achievement

#388 of 680

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA schools

#681 in WA

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

This school's raw scores understate its performance — it ranks much higher after adjusting for context.

Data confidence:High1114 students tested 8 years96% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #142 of 680

in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA schools

Raw test scores rank this school #388, but after accounting for context, students here outperform what the data would predict. The Decoded Rank places it at #142.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • StrongStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • LowEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%82+11.1
Students gain ground year over year 30%87+11.0
Equity within the school 15%1-7.3
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%96+4.6

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA (680 schools)#388#142
WA (1506 schools)#681#293
Among similar schools (6 peers)#3#3

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
566
Free/reduced-price lunch
57.2%
Student-teacher ratio
18.3:1
Locale
City, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$78,995ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.2%ACS tract proxy
SES index
42.1
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Seattle School District No. 1: #23 of 78.Top-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Two distinct groups are visible: a strong cluster at the top and a struggling cluster at the bottom.

  • Level 1 — Below standard33%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard19%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)20%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard28%

Why this matters. A bimodal distribution often reflects two student populations served side-by-side (for example a gifted or honors track alongside a general-population cohort). Aggregate scores can hide this. Look at the school's program mix when comparing.

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Garfield High School Rankings coming soon.
Thurgood Marshall Elementary#69#140High
Bailey Gatzert Elementary School#573#661Medium
Leschi Elementary School#460#670High
Summit Public School: Sierra Rankings coming soon.

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Washington Elementary School#11#27High
Foothills Middle School#16#7High
Broadview-Thomson K-8 School#519#548High
Royal High School Rankings coming soon.
Stevenson Elementary#593#679High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#388#142
2024#418#91
2023#391#61

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 772024: percentile 722025: percentile 82

Holding steady

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +2.5 pct/yr (95% CI -47.3 to 52.4)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 6th grade here in 2015 gained 11 proficiency points by 8th grade.

Based on 16 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: +6.9 proficiency points/yr (95% CI 2.3 to 11.5)

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
275
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
276
G8
288
+12.6
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
269
G7
292
G8
280
+5.6
ELA · started 6th in 2016
G6
290
G7
291
G8
311
+10.5
ELA · started 6th in 2017
G6
290
G7
309
G8
318
+14.0
ELA · started 6th in 2018
G6
300
G7
298
-2.3
ELA · started 6th in 2019
G6
295
ELA · started 8th in 2023
G8
263
ELA · started 7th in 2023
G7
238
G8
252
+14.2
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
226
G7
228
G8
245
+9.5
ELA · started 6th in 2024
G6
247
G7
251
+4.6
ELA · started 6th in 2025
G6
248
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
284
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
285
G8
282
-2.9
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
272
G7
290
G8
282
+5.2
Math · started 6th in 2016
G6
279
G7
292
G8
308
+14.8
Math · started 6th in 2017
G6
282
G7
311
G8
320
+18.8
Math · started 6th in 2018
G6
305
G7
293
-11.7
Math · started 6th in 2019
G6
313
Math · started 8th in 2023
G8
243
Math · started 7th in 2023
G7
217
G8
208
-8.4
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
234
G7
225
G8
218
-7.9
Math · started 6th in 2024
G6
233
G7
246
+13.1
Math · started 6th in 2025
G6
242

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.45 (95% CI: +0.44 to +0.46)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
42.1
FRL %
57.2%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$78,995
Tract poverty rate
0.2%
Tract % bachelor's+
60.0%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →