Victor Falls Elementary

Bonney Lake, WA · Grades ?–5

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Top 30% decoded

#186 of 680

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA schools

★ Above Expected

#348 in WA

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Top 30% achievement

#138 of 680

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA schools

#162 in WA

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Decoded performance is roughly in line with expectations for this school's context.

Data confidence:High523 students tested 8 years99% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #186 of 680

in Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA schools

Raw test scores rank this school #138, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #186.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • LowStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Above averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%90+13.9
Students gain ground year over year 30%10-12.0
Equity within the school 15%75+3.8
Direction over recent years 10%100+5.0
Most students were tested 10%99+4.9

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA (680 schools)#138#186
WA (1506 schools)#162#348
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#3

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
513
Free/reduced-price lunch
32.9%
Student-teacher ratio
19.0:1
Locale
Suburb, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$122,380ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.0%ACS tract proxy
SES index
68.0
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Sumner-Bonney Lake School District: #8 of 11.Bottom-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard11%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard18%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)28%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard43%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Bonney Lake High School Rankings coming soon.
Mountain View Middle School#270#216High
Liberty Ridge Elementary#266#189Medium
Donald Eismann Elementary#171#240High
Tehaleh Heights Elementary School#21#13High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
CAM Academy Rankings coming soon.
Port Susan Middle School#301#158High
Vinland Elementary#12#43High
Crystal Springs Elementary#215#204High
Lakeland Hills Elementary#243#536High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#138#186
2024#202#473
2023#210#488

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 572024: percentile 592025: percentile 90

Trending up

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +16.6 pct/yr (95% CI -88.9 to 122.1)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 24 proficiency points by 5th grade.

Based on 16 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -9.3 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -16.7 to -1.8)

Medium confidence

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
287
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
330
G5
323
-7.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
308
G4
309
G5
284
-12.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
295
G4
275
G5
289
-3.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
276
G4
295
G5
301
+12.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
312
G4
288
-23.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
296
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
291
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
259
G5
264
+4.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
329
G4
291
G5
288
-20.5
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
312
G4
282
-29.3
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
325
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
275
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
320
G5
308
-11.6
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
311
G4
314
G5
270
-20.2
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
286
G4
267
G5
260
-12.7
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
258
G4
291
G5
306
+24.2
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
308
G4
297
-10.6
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
301
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
247
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
252
G5
245
-6.9
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
316
G4
286
G5
279
-18.5
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
324
G4
293
-31.4
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
341

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.66 (95% CI: +0.60 to +0.72)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
68.0
FRL %
32.9%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$122,380
Tract poverty rate
0.0%
Tract % bachelor's+
15.5%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →