Sunnyside Environmental School

Portland, OR · Grades K–8

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

Middle 40% decoded

#193 of 462

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Performing as Expected

#424 in OR

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Top 30% achievement

#104 of 462

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

#137 in OR

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Students score highly here; once neighborhood context is considered, the school performs closer to expected.

Data confidence:High619 students tested 8 years95% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #193 of 462

in Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA schools

Raw test scores rank this school #104, but families here have higher-than-average income and educational attainment, so the expected score is also high. After accounting for context, this school performs about as predicted — the Decoded Rank is #193.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • StrongPerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 35% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • Below averageStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 30% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Below averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 15% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • About averageDirection over recent yearsCounts for 10% of the rank

    Is this school's Decoded Rank trending up or down across the years we have data for?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 10% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 35%85+12.1
Students gain ground year over year 30%27-6.8
Equity within the school 15%32-2.8
Direction over recent years 10%50+0.0
Most students were tested 10%95+4.5

Note: this school's Alpha-only Decoded Rank is #72 (vs the composite #193). The composite includes cohort progression and other signals that diverge from the context-adjusted Alpha. See methodology.

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA (462 schools)#104#193
OR (882 schools)#137#424
Among similar schools (6 peers)#3#4

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
461
Free/reduced-price lunch
41.6%
Student-teacher ratio
18.4:1
Locale
City, large
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$95,411ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
0.1%ACS tract proxy
SES index
71.6
Assessment data year
2025
CCD year
2024
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Portland SD 1J: #38 of 74.Middle quintile in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Two distinct groups are visible: a strong cluster at the top and a struggling cluster at the bottom.

  • Level 1 — Below standard22%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard22%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)27%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard30%

Why this matters. A bimodal distribution often reflects two student populations served side-by-side (for example a gifted or honors track alongside a general-population cohort). Aggregate scores can hide this. Look at the school's program mix when comparing.

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Hosford Middle School#95#245High
Richmond Elementary School#29#131High
da Vinci Middle School#145#146High
Glencoe Elementary School#18#8High
Le Monde French Immersion Public Charter School#5#5High

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Mt Tabor Middle School#58#106High
Athey Creek Middle School#106#50High
Rose City Park#108#373High
Bridger Creative Science School Rankings coming soon.
Beaumont Middle School#75#126High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2025#104#193
2024#100#168
2023#113#179

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

2023: percentile 842024: percentile 882025: percentile 85

Holding steady

Based on 3 years (2023–2025).

Slope: +0.1 pct/yr (95% CI -27.8 to 28.1)

Low confidence

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 3rd grade here in 2015 lost 31 proficiency points by 7th grade — declining about 6× faster than the metro median.

Based on 28 cohorts across math + ELA.

Learning rate: -6.3 proficiency points/yr (95% CI -10.8 to -1.8)

Cohort 20152016201720182019202320242025 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
296
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
271
G8
300
+29.0
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
245
G7
281
G8
288
+21.7
ELA · started 5th in 2015
G5
274
G6
291
G7
284
G8
264
-3.7
ELA · started 4th in 2015
G4
305
G5
311
G6
281
G7
273
G8
278
-9.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2015
G3
289
G4
291
G5
298
G6
269
G7
257
-8.6
ELA · started 3rd in 2016
G3
289
G4
266
G5
302
G6
272
-1.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2017
G3
302
G4
307
G5
305
+1.4
ELA · started 3rd in 2018
G3
271
G4
277
G8
234
-8.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2019
G3
280
G7
255
G8
238
-7.9
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
256
G7
260
G8
251
-2.4
ELA · started 5th in 2023
G5
294
G6
279
G7
294
-0.4
ELA · started 4th in 2023
G4
272
G5
270
G6
278
+3.0
ELA · started 3rd in 2023
G3
316
G4
293
G5
286
-14.9
ELA · started 3rd in 2024
G3
304
G4
298
-6.2
ELA · started 3rd in 2025
G3
218
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
256
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
275
G8
258
-16.8
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
227
G7
262
G8
260
+16.5
Math · started 5th in 2015
G5
286
G6
271
G7
269
G8
200
-26.0
Math · started 4th in 2015
G4
284
G5
295
G6
258
G7
255
G8
227
-15.4
Math · started 3rd in 2015
G3
276
G4
291
G5
266
G6
229
G7
218
-17.9
Math · started 3rd in 2016
G3
279
G4
269
G5
258
G6
227
-16.9
Math · started 3rd in 2017
G3
277
G4
254
G5
247
-15.1
Math · started 3rd in 2018
G3
255
G4
247
G8
204
-10.5
Math · started 3rd in 2019
G3
212
G7
240
G8
212
+2.0
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
239
G7
231
G8
209
-14.7
Math · started 5th in 2023
G5
270
G6
251
G7
278
+4.4
Math · started 4th in 2023
G4
279
G5
253
G6
252
-13.7
Math · started 3rd in 2023
G3
292
G4
310
G5
273
-9.3
Math · started 3rd in 2024
G3
289
G4
298
+9.5
Math · started 3rd in 2025
G3
231

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality.

Shrunk Alpha (95% CI)
+0.50 (95% CI: +0.45 to +0.54)

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
71.6
FRL %
41.6%
ELL %
SPED %
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$95,411
Tract poverty rate
0.1%
Tract % bachelor's+
70.7%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2024–25 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2024
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
May 29, 2026
Methodology version
0.2.0

Cross-state metro note: This metro spans state lines. Both states use Smarter Balanced assessments with a common scale for grades 3–8 ELA/math. Context-adjusted ranks are computed within each state's testing context, then aggregated across the metro.

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →