Frontier Middle School

Moses Lake, WA · Grades 6–8

Moses Lake, WA

Neighborhood

Decoded Rank

All factors combined

1½ stars

WA statewide rating — the rank below is this school's statewide position

Bottom 30% decoded

#1260 of 1502

Washington schools

#34 · Moses Lake metro

Achievement Rank

Raw test performance

Bottom 15% achievement

#1288 of 1502

Washington schools

#23 · Moses Lake metro

places from achievement to Decoded Rank

Raw achievement and decoded performance are both close to expected for this school's context.

Data confidence:High1450 students tested 7 years97% participation

Confidence is computed from sample size, year coverage, and participation rate. Higher confidence means the rank shift is stable across years and not driven by a single small cohort.

  • Tested students: total students with valid scores across all reported years.
  • Years of data: number of school years included. More years smooths year-to-year noise.
  • Participation: share of enrolled students who took the assessment. Low participation can bias scores.

What's driving this rank

Decoded Rank: #1260 of 1502

in Washington schools

Raw test scores rank this school #1288, but after accounting for context, students here outperform what the data would predict. The Decoded Rank places it at #1260.

Each component below is scored on a 0–100 within-metro scale. A qualitative band summarizes where the school lands.

  • Below averagePerforms above what its context predictsCounts for 39% of the rank

    After accounting for income and demographics, does this school beat what the data would predict?

  • LowStudents gain ground year over yearCounts for 33% of the rank

    Are kids at this school learning faster than typical for the metro?

  • Below averageEquity within the schoolCounts for 17% of the rank

    Are students clustered at similar levels, or split between top and bottom?

  • StrongMost students were testedCounts for 11% of the rank

    Was the rank computed against a representative share of the school's students?

Show the numbersFor the methodology-curious

Each component is converted to a 0–100 within-metro percentile (100 = top of the metro). "Contribution" is the percentile-points the component adds to (or subtracts from) the metro median before the schools are re-ranked into the composite.

Per-component contributions to this school's Decoded Rank composite. Weight is the share each component carries; percentile is the school's within-metro score on that component.
ComponentWeightPercentileContribution
Performs above what its context predicts 39%35-6.0
Students gain ground year over year 33%16-11.2
Equity within the school 17%29-3.5
Most students were tested 11%97+5.3

How the Decoded Rank composite is computed

Why trust this?
  • Public data sources
  • Context-adjusted model
  • Confidence shown
  • Methodology published

This score uses state assessment data, NCES enrollment data, and Census ACS 5-year neighborhood data. The Decoded Rank adjusts for school context — student demographics, ELL/SPED service rates, and the socioeconomic profile of the surrounding tract — and shows how the school performs relative to expectation, not in absolute terms.

SchoolDecoder is one signal, not a verdict. Decoded Rank is a context-adjusted residual, not a causal claim about teaching quality. See full methodology →

Strongest Subjects (Decoded)

Decoded rank first; achievement rank in parentheses. Sorted by decoded rank, best first. Science is shown for reference only and is not part of any rank, tier, or composite.

  1. Science

    2023 proficiency32.6%meeting standard

    Tested gradeGrade 8

    245 tested

    202228.4%202332.6%

    Shown for reference only — science is not part of any rank.

All Rankings

How this school ranks across the metro, state, and among demographic peers.

ScopeAchievementDecodedShift
WA (1502 schools)#1288#1260
Moses Lake, WA (38 schools)#23#34
Among similar schools (6 peers)#2#1

Resource context

School inputs, not ranking points

These fields describe the school and surrounding neighborhood. They help readers interpret the page, but this is not a dollar-by-dollar or ratio-by-ratio scorecard and the fields here are not components of the Decoded Rank.

Enrollment
758
Free/reduced-price lunch
71.8%
Student-teacher ratio
17.6:1
Locale
Town, remote
School type
Regular public school
Enrollment model
Neighborhood attendance area
Neighborhood median income
$45,417ACS tract proxy
Neighborhood poverty
31.0%ACS tract proxy
SES index
8.6
Assessment data year
2023
CCD year
2022
ACS vintage
2020-2024

Within Moses Lake School District: #11 of 14.Bottom-40% in district. View district

Performance Spread

How students are distributed across the four state-assessment proficiency levels — L1: below standard, L2: approaching, L3: meets (proficient), L4: exceeds. This describes the shape of results at the school, not their height.

Students at this school cluster closely on the proficiency ladder.

  • Level 1 — Below standard45%
  • Level 2 — Approaching standard27%
  • Level 3 — Meets standard (proficient)19%
  • Level 4 — Exceeds standard9%

Performance Spread measures how evenly students are distributed across the L1..L4 proficiency ladder, treating the levels as an ordered scale (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4) and weighting each by its student share. A school where most students cluster at one level has a TIGHT spread; a school split between the bottom and top has a WIDE or BIMODAL spread. Bimodal fires only when BOTH tails are non-trivial AND the middle is relatively hollow (pct_L1 ≥ 15, pct_L4 ≥ 25, pct_L2 + pct_L3 ≤ 60). It describes shape — NOT how high the school's scores are. Methodology

Nearby Schools

Sorted by distance. Both rank columns shown so you can compare quickly.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
Knolls Vista Elementary#19#37High
Midway Elementary#28#20Medium
Moses Lake Early Learning CenterRankings coming soon
Park Orchard Elementary School#9#11High
Garden Heights Elementary#20#38Medium

Similar Schools

Schools with comparable demographics, income, and size. Both rank columns shown for direct comparison.

SchoolRatingAchievementDecodedShiftStoryConfidence
East Valley Central Middle School#19#49High
Spanaway Middle School#426#149High
Perry G Keithley Middle School#658#652Medium
Centralia High SchoolRanking unavailable
Wilson Middle School#31#53High

Historical Ranks

Year-by-year decoded and achievement ranks. Pandemic-affected years are excluded — we don't interpolate scores across the gap.

YearAchievementDecodedShift
2023#23#34

Note: assessment transitions (where a state changes its test) are footnoted on the methodology page; trends are not computed across breakpoints.

Trajectory

Not used in the Decoded Rank — shown for context only.

Not enough years yet

Trajectory will appear once we have two or more years of rankings for this school.

How this works: we fit a linear trend across the available years of Decoded percentile, then bucket the slope into a direction. Wide confidence intervals (uncertain trends) collapse to Holding steady. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Cohort Progression

Kids who started 6th grade here in 2022 gained 8 proficiency points by 7th grade — gaining about 6× the metro median rate.

Cohort-to-cohort variance is high — interpret the headline cautiously.

Learning rate: +16.9 proficiency points/yr (95% CI 6.9 to 26.9)

Medium confidence

Cohort 2015201620172018201920222023 Slope
ELA · started 8th in 2015
G8
233
—
ELA · started 7th in 2015
G7
235
G8
250
+14.7
ELA · started 6th in 2015
G6
194
G7
252
G8
247
+26.1
ELA · started 6th in 2016
G6
218
G7
243
G8
248
+15.2
ELA · started 6th in 2017
G6
209
G7
239
G8
239
+15.1
ELA · started 6th in 2018
G6
208
G7
245
+37.3
ELA · started 6th in 2019
G6
239
—
ELA · started 8th in 2022
G8
219
—
ELA · started 7th in 2022
G7
224
G8
219
-5.3
ELA · started 6th in 2022
G6
180
G7
188
+8.4
ELA · started 6th in 2023
G6
196
—
Math · started 8th in 2015
G8
206
—
Math · started 7th in 2015
G7
204
G8
235
+30.4
Math · started 6th in 2015
G6
182
G7
212
G8
210
+13.7
Math · started 6th in 2016
G6
184
G7
209
G8
249
+32.6
Math · started 6th in 2017
G6
180
G7
218
G8
241
+30.9
Math · started 6th in 2018
G6
188
G7
225
+37.0
Math · started 6th in 2019
G6
211
—
Math · started 8th in 2022
G8
211
—
Math · started 7th in 2022
G7
208
G8
195
-12.6
Math · started 6th in 2022
G6
182
G7
161
-20.9
Math · started 6th in 2023
G6
189
—

How this works: we follow each grade-cohort across years through the school (3rd graders in 2023 are 4th graders in 2024, etc.) and fit a linear slope on a 100–400 proficiency-points scale built from the state assessment's four levels (L1=1, L2=2, L3=3, L4=4, weighted by student share). This is the same construction Stanford SEDA uses (edopportunity.org/methods); it's not student-level tracking — we measure the school's cohort, not individuals. See the methodology page for thresholds.

Evidence & technical detailClick to expand

School Alpha

School Alpha is the residual between actual and expected performance once school context is held constant. It is a context-adjusted estimate, not a causal claim about teaching quality. Its reliability shows up on the page as the confidence label and the rank interval, not as a standalone statistic.

SES index components

SES method
Blended SES index (ACS + FRL)
SES index value
8.6
FRL %
71.8%
ELL %
11.8% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
SPED %
11.3% · WA OSPI Report Card Enrollment
Tract median income (ACS 5-year)
$45,417
Tract poverty rate
31.0%
Tract % bachelor's+
14.5%

What "Decoded Rank" means

Decoded Rank converts School Alpha — the context-adjusted residual — into a parent-facing rank within the metro pool. A higher Decoded Rank than Achievement Rank means the school's raw scores understate its performance once neighborhood and school context are held constant. The reverse means raw scores overstate it. The rank is one signal, not a verdict.

Data & sources

Assessment data
2022–23 school year
NCES CCD vintage
2022
Census ACS 5-year vintage
2020-2024
Last updated
September 4, 2026
Methodology version
0.14.0
Source files (3)

SchoolDecoder publishes context-adjusted residuals, not causal estimates. Decoded Rank is one signal — not a verdict on teaching quality. Read about limitations →